|
The time for contractors (i.e. potential bidders/candidates) to obtain procurement documentation has been reduced, but by less than % of the deadline for submitting tenders, in accordance with the applicable regulations. The percentage of the subsidy refund is %. The time for economic operators (i.e. potential tenderers/candidates) to obtain the procurement documents is days or less, or if the contracting authority has not in any way provided full, direct and free access to the procurement documents via electronic means.
The percentage of the subsidy refund is %. Selection criteria, award criteria A. Failure to publish the selection or award criteria (and their weighting) in the contract notice or contract documents. The beneficiary returns % of the funding . B. Failure to publish the contract execution conditions photo retouching or technical specifications in the contract notice or contract documentation. The beneficiary returns % of the funding . C. Neither the contract notice nor the tender criteria or their weighting in sufficient detail, resulting in an undue restriction of competition (i.e. the lack of sufficient detail may have had a dissuasive effect on potential bidders). The beneficiary returns % of the funding.
An exception occurs when, before the deadline for the submission of tenders, the contracting authority, at the request of the tenderers, has explained the contract award criteria and their importance in sufficient detail. D. Clarifications or additional information (related to the selection or award criteria) provided by the contracting authority were not communicated to all bidders or published. The beneficiary returns % of the funding . Application of discriminatory grounds based on unjustified national or local preferences Cases where economic operators may have been discouraged from submitting a tender due to exclusion, selection or award criteria or procurement conditions involving unjustified national, regional or local preferences.
|
|