Judgment of the District Court in Gliwice of October. IMPORTANT - if the employer has paid remuneration and the product or service turns out to be defective due to the employee's fault undue amounts may be duct from the remuneration only with the prior consent of the employee. If a product or service is defectively manufactur it is worth remembering that the employer is not oblig to allow the employee to remove the defect. Only at the request of the employer the employee is oblig to remove the defect for which he is not entitl to additional remuneration and what is more the removal of the consequences of faulty work is not part of the employee's working time.
Are you wondering how much the minimum wage is in ? If so go here. Case law Judgment of the District philippines photo editor Court of Labor and Social Insurance in Łódź of February ref. no. IP file / Article of the Labor Code allows the workplace not to pay remuneration to an employee for poor quality work and if only part of the work is affect by defects or faults - for that part. However the condition for the workplace to exercise this right is the production of poor quality products or services due to the employee's fault. Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Katowice of February.
Poor quality of products manufactur by the brigade cannot be equat with the employee's liability under Art. kp; Deprivation of remuneration pursuant to Art. § of the Labor Code may only take place if it is demonstrat that the defective performance of products or services was due to the fault of a specific employee. It is consider insufficient for the employer to indicate that the entire brigade in which the plaintiff also work is responsible for defective products.
發表於 13:36:15
